Time-to-Market (TTM) is the length of time it takes from a product or feature’s initial conception until it is successfully developed, tested, and released for use by the end consumer. In the highly competitive travel industry where OTAs, airlines, and nimble tech startups constantly battle for market share TTM is a critical KPI. A shorter TTM means capturing early adopters, capitalizing on fleeting travel trends, and generating a ROI much faster than competitors.
Travel is an inherently seasonal and trend-driven business. In this environment, development speed directly correlates with revenue.
To aggressively shrink their time-to-market, modern travel companies have largely abandoned legacy Waterfall development (where a system is built in secret for two years and released all at once) in favor of Agile methodologies.
The core tactic is the Minimum Viable Product (MVP).
Instead of spending a year building a perfect, all-encompassing flight booking tool, a startup will launch an MVP in three months. The MVP will only search round-trip flights, accept only Visa/Mastercard, and only connect to one API aggregator.
As a result, the company gets to market instantly, starts generating revenue, and uses real customer data to build the nice-to-have features (like multi-city search or Amex support) in subsequent, rapid updates.
The biggest lever a travel company can pull to reduce TTM is the build vs. buy calculation.
If a new OTA wants to offer hotel inventory, they could spend two years building 50 direct API connections to individual hotel chains (Build). Alternatively, they could pay a premium to license a single connection from an API aggregator or bedbank and go live in three weeks (Buy). While buying usually means accepting lower profit margins, the drastic reduction in TTM often makes it the smarter commercial strategy.
Not always. In travel tech, releasing a buggy product can be catastrophic. If you rush a booking engine to market and it has a caching error that accidentally prices a $1,000 flight at $10, the financial loss will instantly wipe out any advantage you gained from launching early.
There is no universal standard, but most engineering teams start the clock when development resources are officially allocated to the project (the kick-off) and stop it when the feature is deployed to the live production environment for real users.
Technical debt is the hidden cost of a fast TTM. When developers are pressured to launch quickly, they often write messy, inefficient code or skip building automated tests. You get to market fast, but you incur debt. If you don’t eventually go back and rewrite that code properly, future updates will become slower and slower until the system breaks.
Leave your request
We will contact you shortly
Thank you for your request!
We will get back to you as quickly as possible
